After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. From lie recognition tools tested at the edge to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being utilized in asylum applications. This article explores This Site how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to understand these systems and to pursue their right for safety.

It also demonstrates how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from being able to view the stations of coverage. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects so, who are regimented by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these systems have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double impact: although they aid to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.